•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The issue of different hadiths is one of the important issues throughout the ages and up to the present day as some disinterested, atheist and enemies of religion try to undermine the noble hadith through false accusations and allegations, including their saying that the hadiths are different from one to another. The scholars were alerted to that and this study came for the purpose of identifying the common and the dispute in the issue of the difference of hadiths and the methods of pushing that difference between two great scholars, Al-Shafi’i and Al-Tusi,. The study was divided as follows: introduction and three sections. Among the most prominent findings of the study is that scholars share and differ in some issues. Among the shared thing is the classification of their books on the basis of the chapters of jurisprudence. They are distinguished in several issues, the most prominent of which is that the methods of raising the difference according to Al-Shafi’i in his writings are three: the combination copying and the weighting. As for Al-Tusi, the methods of raising the difference between the hadiths about him are likewise three ways: the weighting, the combination and the choice.

Article Type

Article

First Page

23

Last Page

40

Publication Date

3-15-2022

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Download

Share

COinS